Tiziana Donadio, Assunta Anna Di Iorio
Innovation in motion : contemporary conception for the Dukla sports complex, a sporting area with one of the greatest potentials in Pardubice, Czech Republic.
Rel. Luigi Buzzacchi, Marianna Nigra. Politecnico di Torino, Corso di laurea magistrale in Architettura Per Il Progetto Sostenibile, 2016
Questa è la versione più aggiornata di questo documento.
| Abstract: |
The idea of developing this thesis was born from our personal experience of trainee- ship in Prague. During this time spent in Czech Republic, we worked on different kind of project, one of them called “Abundare”, it was based on the design of a new sports center in Fulnek; energy and dedication have been spent on this project which allowed us to grow professionally. Thanks to this and to the passion and the culture of local people for healthy living and for sports activities, we decided to solve the challenge for a new multipurpose facility in Pardubice, a little city not far from Prague. The project area was visited on the spot: the biggest part of the complex is unused, there are buildings with different characteristics that often do not meet current standards for both proper physical activities for pupils and users that for all those clubs who play sports at competitive. Driven by these reasons we have chosen to analyze in terms of possible strategies to apply, some case studies: in this work, we collected the results of researches, that are aimed at adaptability of sports facilities to user’s needs and explore the spatial integration of sport facilities and the mixing of sport with other functions. Is it possible to reinforce sport inside urban environments, instead of pushing it’s away because of no attractive investment reasons? Aim is to understand how sport can be integrated physical in cities and urban environments, to design a functional and innovative solution in Pardubice. We have collected overview of inspiring examples and methodologies applied in different places which shows all the benefits can derive from those architecture, and how to pursue success through spatial and programmatic relation of the sport facility with its direct surroundings. What can be learned from successful examples from sport? What is spatially possible? What organizational aspects are essential for this purpose? How to apply the results by new and renewal projects? The first part of the work is aimed to analyze positive and negative impacts of those architecture on society, economy and urban structure. In this part, studies from the 20th century examine how facilities are important engines of economic growth, on the other hand some other case that found no evidence of positive economic impact of facilities on urban economy, are also described. By the comparison of the results, we have decided to apply our “our process for the measurement of benefits”. It was carried out first on the current state and then on the project, considering mainly the tools and components required to achieve with the new proposal, some good degree of innovation and quality. This analysis was useful to find sustainability strategies, innovative architectural solutions which can respond to required changes to buildings over time in line with current requirements of owners and users of the buildings. Ultimately, results of the various examples, data collected and our analysis are translated into a design project which consists of spatial, programmatic aspects developed to improve the existing situation and for new assignments (asked by the brief of the contest) where the main goal is to integrate sport physical and programmatic with its urban environment and introduce strategic goals to develop and grow new opportunities for the entire city. |
|---|---|
| Relatori: | Luigi Buzzacchi, Marianna Nigra |
| Tipo di pubblicazione: | A stampa |
| Soggetti: | A Architettura > AF Edifici e attrezzature per il tempo libero, le attività sociali, lo sport U Urbanistica > UK Pianificazione urbana |
| Corso di laurea: | Corso di laurea magistrale in Architettura Per Il Progetto Sostenibile |
| Classe di laurea: | Nuovo ordinamento > Laurea magistrale > LM-04 - ARCHITETTURA E INGEGNERIA EDILE-ARCHITETTURA |
| Aziende collaboratrici: | NON SPECIFICATO |
| URI: | http://webthesis.biblio.polito.it/id/eprint/5866 |
| Capitoli: | INTRODUCTION 0.0 Introduction 0.1 Objectives 0.2 Executive Summary PARTI CHAPTER I 1.0 Competitive Market Assessment and Facility Recommendations CHAPTER II 2.0 General Market Overview 2.1 Demographic and Economic Statistics 2.2 Area employment CHAPTER in 3.0 Trends and Potential Demand 3.1 Facility Requirements 3.2 Sports participation trends 3.3 Organizational context in Czech Republic 3.4 Potential demand generators CHAPTER IV 4 Comparable Facility Case Studies 4.1 The case of the Darebin International Sport Center 4.2 Participation as a function of program attractiveness 4.3 Positive and negative impacts: the controversy CHAPTER V 5.0 Program in Pardubice: measurement of benefits 5.1 Indicators for a sustainable design 5.2 Innovation and the value-add of architecture 5.3 Our process for the measurement of benefits PART II CHAPTER VI 6.0 Pardubice Place and history 6.1 Localization of the city 6.2 Historical background 6.3 Sport traditions 6.4 Public facilities and sport events 6.5 Historical core 6.6 Architecture of 20th century CHAPTER VII 7.0 Site analysis 7.1 Green areas 7.2 Road transport 7.3 Rail transport 7.4 Air transport CHAPTER VIII 8.0 Climate analysis 8.1 Natural conditions and weather 8.2 Precipitation 8.3 Wind CHAPTER IX 9.0 Social analysis 9.1 Population 9.2 Sports 9.3 Use of sports building 9.4 Economy CHAPTER X 10.0 Analysis of the area 10.1 Requirements from the brief 10.2 Programme CHAPTER XI 11.0 Analysis of some sport architectures 11.1 Problems connected to these typologies 11.2 Take inspiration from CHAPTER XII 12.0 Project limits and opportunities 12.1 Functional zones 12.2 Primary identification 12.3 Limits and opportunities 12.4 Matrix CHAPTER XIII 13.0 Concept 13.1 Eadweard Muybridge 13.2Sketches CHAPTER XIV 14.0 Solving 14.1 Building A_ Innovation in motion 14.2 Building B_ Basketball Hall 14.3 Building C_ Inflatable Hall 14.4 Building D_ Quarantine CONCLUDING COMMENTS REFERENCE |
| Bibliografia: | (2015) Director. Ing. Veronika Ticha. Statistical Yearbok of the Pardubicky Region in Czech Statistical Office, Pardubice (web source). Available here:https://www.czso.cz/documents/10180/20548727/33009215.pdf/262948e9-53e9-4d98-aa39-ca-e57f8fd451?version=1.9 (2015) Crossroad Consulting Services; “Market and Economic Analysis for a Potential New Indoor Multi-Sport Facility in Little Rock, Arkansas”, presented to Little Rock Convention & Visitors Bureau (web source). Available here:http://www.littlerock.com/!userfiles/editor/docs/2015SportsFeasibilityStudy.pdf (2012) Brad Grill, B. Christine Green; “Repeat participation as a function of program attractiveness, socializing opportunities, loyalty and the sportscape across three sport facility contexts”, Sport Management Review 15, pp. 485-499 (2011) Gemma Harper Richard Price; “A framework for understanding the social impacts of policy and their effects on wellbeing, a paper for the Social Impacts Taskforce ”, London, (web source). Available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69196/pb13467-social-impacts-wellbeing-110403.pdf (2010) Jackie Grieve, Emma Sherry; “Community benefits of major sport facilities: The Darebin International Sports Centre”, Sport Managementt Review 15, pp 218-229 (2010) European Parliament and the Council; “Directive 2010/31/ EU” on the energy performance of the buildings (recast), Officila Journal of the European Union (2005 )Maarten van Bottenburg, Bas Rijnen, Jacco van Sterkenburg; “Sport participation in the European Union, Trends and differences” commissioned by Nike Europe Operations Netherlands BV (web source). Available here: https://www.academia.edu/8019163/177_Van_Bottenburg_et_al._-_Sports_participation_in_the_EU (2004) Chad Seifried, Aaron W. Clopton; “An alternative view of public subsidy and sport facilities through Social Anchor Theory”, City Culture and Society (2002) Rychtecky A. The process of education and training in physical education - Sensorimotor Learning. (1997) R.A Slaughter., “Developing and applying strategic foresight”, ABN Report, vol. 5, no. 10 (1990) Rebecca M. Henderson, Kim B. Clark; “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms”, Administrative Science Quarterly, ABI/INFORM Global p. 9
(1987) “WCED-Our Common Future”, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future (web source). Available here: http://www.undocuments.net/our-common-future.pdf (1942) Joseph Alois Schumpeter; “Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy”, Harper & Brothers, United States (—) The California Academy of Sciences, “Our Green Building”, consulted on September 2016. Available here: http://www.calacademy.org/our-green-building (—)USGBC;“LEED: Better Buildings are our legacy”, consulted on September 2016. Available here: http://www.usgbc.org/leed |
 |
Modifica (riservato agli operatori) |
Licenza Creative Commons - Attribuzione 3.0 Italia