ESSAY 2

This essay exposes concerns and possible responses to the increasingly problematic issue of reading and understanding the contemporary city. Its central aim is to hypothesise and sketch a set of methods which have been variously assembled during fieldwork. It is argued that they are informed by a specific set of "non-representational" theoretical contributions which strive lor the opening up of new questions and research fields, involving a few aspects which seem to worl< well as a background hum rather than precise taxonomies. This same experimentalism dominates the methodological choices of this work, resulting in an assemblage of tools and techniques. This approach appears to be valuable since, as we will see, it allows for a recognition and description of marginal, often unspoken contexts which can constitute a basis to build specific arguments.

ESSAY 3

Moving from the strongly phenomenological interest so far represented, this essay works tonds the unraveling of the diverse ontological conditions which affect the urban interstices of rcelona. It does so weaving together a series of contributions which highlight different and foi/radictoty positions: are these spaces abandoned? are they victims or emissaries of dom-inant power logics? are they spaces of resistance and opposition? It is argued here that such stances provide only partial insights, therefore a personal tentative contribution will be made in oider to attach another hue to these highly layered spaces which demand a decisively open approach to research.

ESSAY 4

If our aim, as architects, is to re-imagine our practice in the urban environment in a context of wo-politico-economical crisis, we firstly need to understand which mechanisms shape our pace, society and everydayness producing the phenomenological output that we have been able to observe. A rather structuralist leap will allow us to unravel the debates over neoliberal legulatory frameworks and their relationships with the urban environment, called into question lor being the global hegemonic system during the last three decades. Through the analysis of iheir socially regressive outputs, highlighting gentrification as the key issue, we will come to juxtapose the emerging alternatives that have been flourishing in response. Conclusions will underline the need to re-politicise, re-discuss and re-propose questions that have been erased from political debate.

ESSAY 5

iie last essay of this series resumes the architectural concerns exposed before and attempts a discussion towards their solution profiting from the aspects that have been emerging during the unraveling of this research work. It does so through the proposal of a number of conceptual transitions, which should be intended as a will to move the focus from one aspect to another, however not completely annihilating the first. These transitions are sorted in three fields which demand to be readjusted according to our aim: our goals, our techniques and our education.

Essay 3 - Interstice as shifting space

Audiovisual work

Essay 4 - Challenges at every scale: from economics to politics

Essay 5 - Personal practice: immediate reflections on future paths

- Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2013). The "Urban Age" in Question. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, The "urban age" in question, 38(3), 731-755.

- Castree, N., & Wright, M. W. (2005). Home Truths. Antipode, 37(1), 1-8.

- Charnock, G., Purcell, T. F., & Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2013). City of Rents: The limits to the

- Barcelona model of urban competitiveness. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(1), 198-217.

- Delgado, M. (2007). La ciudad mentirosa. Fraude y miseria del "modelo Barcelona". Madrid: Los libros de la Catarata.

- DETR. (2003). Towards an urban renaissance: report of the Urban Task Force, 1-28.

- Gehl, J. (2011). Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

- Gleeson, B. (2012). The urban age: paradox and prospect. Urban Studies, 49(5), 1-13.

- Governa, F. (2014). Tra geografia e politiche. Roma: Donzelli.

- Hall, S., Massey, D., & Rustin, M. (2013). After neoliberalism: analysing the present. Soundings: A journal of politics and culture, 53(1), 8-22.

- Harvey, D. (1974). What Kind of Geography for What Kind of Public Policy? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 63, 18-24.

- Hyde, R. (2012). Future Practice: Conversations from the Edge of Architecture. London-New York: Routledge.

- Knight, P. G. (1986). Why Doesn't Geography Do Something? Area, 333-384.

- Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

- Lees, L. (2008). Gentrification and Social Mixing: Towards an Inclusive Urban Renaissance? Urban Studies, 45( 12), 2449-2470.

- Moix, L. (1994). La ciudad de los arquitectos. Barcelona: Anagrama.

- Montaner, J. M., Alvarez, F., Muxi, Z., & Casanovas, R. (Eds.). (2014). Reader. Modelo Barcelona 1973-2013.. Barcelona: Comanegra.

- Rajakovics, P. (2012). About poaching. In S. Forlati, A. Isopp, A. Piber (Eds.), Wonderland Manual for Emerging Architects (pp. 40-45). Wien/New York: Springer.

- Sassen, S. (1991). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

- Sassen, S. (1994). Cities in a World Economy. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

- Smith, N. (1979). Toward a Theory of Gentrification A Back to the City Movement by Capital, not People. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45(4), 538-548.

- Till, J. (2009). Architecture Depends. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.

- UN-Habitat. (2007). The state of the world's cities Report 2006/2007 — 30 years of shaping the Habitat agenda. London: Earthscan for UN-Habitat.

- UNFPA. (2007). State of world population 2007: unleashing the potential of urban growth. United Nations Population Fund. New York. Retrieved 2014 from http://www.unfpa.org/ swp/2007/english/introduction.html

- Vendler, H. (1995). The Breaking of Style. Cambridge, AAA: Harvard University Press.

WEBOGRAPHY

- ww.australiandesignreview.com

- www.failedarchitecture.com

- www.newgenerationsweb.com

- www.youtube.com

ESSAY 2’S BIBLIOGRAPHY

- Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities: reimagining the urban. Cambridge: Polity Press.

- Anderson, B. (2006). Becoming and being hopeful: towards a theory of affect. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24, 733-752.

- Benjamin, W. (1973). Charles Baudelaire: A Lyric Poet in the Era of High Capitalism. London: New Left Books.

- Bignante, E. (2011 ). Geografia e ricerca visuale. Strumenti e metodi. Roma-Bari: Laterza. Clob, P., Cook, l.,Crang, P., Goodwin, M., Painter, J., & Philo, C. (2004). Doing Ethnographies. In Practising Human Geography (pp. 169-205). London: SAGE.

- Cook, I. (2005). Participant observation. In Flowerdew, R., & Martin, D. (Eds.). Methods in Human Geography (pp. 167-190). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.

- Crang, M. (2002). Qualitative methods: the new orthodoxy Progress in Human Geography, 26(5), 647-655.

- Crang, M. (2003). Qualitative methods: touchy, feely, look-see Progress in Human Geography, 27(4), 494-504.

- Crang, M. (2005). Qualitative methods: there is nothing outside the text? Progress in Human Geography, 29(2), 225-233.

- Crang, M., &Cook, I. (2007). Doing Ethnographies. London: SAGE.

- Davidson, J., Bondi, L., & Smith, M. (Eds.). (2012). Emotional Geographies. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.

- Davies, G., & Dwyer, C. (2007). Qualitative methods: are you enchanted or are you alienated? Progress in Human Geography, 3 7(2), 257-266.

- Davies, G., & Dwyer, C. (2008). Qualitative methods II: Minding the Gap. Progress in Human Geography, 32(3), 399-406.

- Davies, G., & Dwyer, C. (2010). Qualitative methods III: animating archives, artful interventions and online environments. Progress in Human Geography, 34(1), 88-97.

- Debord, G. (1955). Introduction à une critique de la géographie urbaine. Les lèvres nues, 6,5-11.

- DeLyser, D. (2008). Teaching qualitative research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32,233-244.

- )ewsbury, J. (2003). Witnessing space: 'knowledge without contemplation'. Environment and Planning A, 35, 1907-1932.

- Dewsbury, J., Harrison, P., Rose, M., & Wylie, J. (2002). Introduction: Enacting Geographies. Geoforum, 33, 437-440.

- Driver, F. (2003). On Geography as a Visual Discipline. Antipode, 35, 227-231.

- Elden, S. (2004). Rhythmanalysis: an introduction. In Rhythmanalysis (pp. vii-xv). London-

'Jew York: Continuum.

- Flowerdew, R., & Martin, D. (Eds.). (2005). Methods in Human Geography. Upper Sai River: Pearson Education.

- Gandy, M., & Nilsen, B. J. (2014). The Acoustic City. Berlin: JOViS Publishers.

- Ginzburg, C. (1979). Spie. Radici di un paradigma indiziario. In A. Gargani (Ed.), Ci della ragione. Nuovi modelli nel rapporto fra sapere e attività umane (pp. 1-30). Torme Einaudi.

- Governa, F., & Memoli, M. (2011 ). Descrivere la città: metodologie, metodi e tecniche. Governa & M. Memoli (Eds.), Geografie dell'urbano (pp. 167-1 90). Roma: Carocci editori

- Harper, D. (1998). An Argument for Visual Sociology. In J. Prosser (Ed.), Image-bast research: A sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Hove: Psychology Press.

- Harrison, P. (2000). Making sense: embodiment and the sensibilities of the everyda) Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 7 8, 497-517.

- Harrison, P. (2007). "How shall I say it?" Relating the non-relational. Environment op: Planning A, 39, 590-608.

- Harrison, P. (2008). Corporeal Remains. Vulnerability, proximity and living-on after the enc of the world. Environment and Planning A, 40, 423-445.

- Hay, I. (Ed.). (2005). Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

- Kindon, S. (2005). Participatory Action Research. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography [pp. 207-220). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

- Koch, R., & Latham, A. (2012). On the Hard Work of Domesticating a Public Space. Urbani Studies, 50(1 ), 6-21.

- Latham, A. (2003). Research, performance, and doing human geography: some reflections on the diary-photograph, diary-interview method. Environment and Planning A, 35, 1993-2017.

- Laurier, E., & Philo, C. (2006). Possible geographies: a passing encounter in a cafe. Area, 38, 353-364.

- Lefebvre, H. (1947). Critique de la vie quotidienne. Paris: L'Arche.

- Lefebvre, H. (1961). Critique de la vie quotidienne II: Fondements d'une sociologie de la quotidienneté. Paris: L'Arche.

- Lefebvre, H. (1981). Critique de la vie quotidienne III: De la modernità au modernism (Pour une métaphilosophie du quotidien). Paris: L'Arche.

- Lefebvre, H. (1992). Eléments de rythmanalyse: Introduction à la connaissance des rythmes Paris: Éditions Syllepse.

- Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on Cities. (E. Kofman & E. Lebas, Eds.). Oxford: Blackwell.

- Lorimer, H. (2005). Cultural geography: the busyness of being "more-than-representational. Progress in Human Geography, 29(1), 83-94.

- Lorimer, H. (2008). Cultural geography: non-representational conditions and concern: Progress in Human Geography, 32(4), 551-559.

- McCormack, D. (2002). A paper with an interest in rhythm. Geoforum, 33, 469-485.

- McCormack, D. (2003). An event of geographical ethics in spaces of affect. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28, 488-507.

- McCormack, D. (2005). Diagramming practice and performance. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23, 119-147.

- Nash, C. (2000). Progress reports, Performativity in practice: some recent work in cultural geography. Progress in Human Geography, 24(4), 653-664.

- Popke, J. (2009). Geography and ethics: non-representational encounters, collective responsibility and economic difference. Progress in Human Geography, 33(1), 81-90.

- Pratt, G. (2000). Participatory action research. In D. Gregory, R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M. Watts, S. Whatmore (Eds), Dictionary of Human Geography. Oxford: Blackwell.

- Pred, R. (2005). Onflow: Dynamics of Consciousness of Experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.

- Rose, G. (2003). On the need to ask how, exactly, is geography "visual"? Antipode, 35, 212-221.

- Rose, G. (2004). On the importance of asking the right questions, or what is the power of PowerPoint, exactly? Antipode, 36, 795-797.

- Ryan, J. (2003). Who's Afraid of Visual Culture Antipode, (35), 232-237.

- Sheringham, M. (2006). Everyday Life. Theories and Practices from Surrealism to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

- Sui, D. Z. (2000). Visuality, Aurality and Shifting Metaphors of Geographical Thought in the Late Twentieth Century. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(2), 322-343.

- Thrift, N. (1996). Spatial Formations. London: Sage.

- Thrift, N. (1997). The Still Point. In S. Pile & M. Keith (Eds.), Geographies of Resistance. London: Routledge.

- Thrift, N. (2000). Afterwords. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 213-255.

- Thrift, N. (2003). Performance and.... Environment and Planning A, 35, 2019-2024.

- Thrift, N. (2004). Intensities of Feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler 8, 86, 57-78.

- Thrift, N. (2008). Non-Representational Theory. Space, Politics, Affect (p. 336). Routledge.

- Vendler, H. (1995). The Breaking of Style. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

- Winchester, H. P. M. (2005). Qualitative Research and its Place in Human Geography. In .Hay (Ed.), Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography (pp. 3-18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

- Wylie, J. (2002). An essay on ascending Glastonbury Tor. Geoforum, 33, 441-454.

- Wylie, J. (2005). A single day's walking: narrating self and landscape on the South West

Coast Path. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30, 234-247.

- Wylie, J. (2006). Depths and folds: on landscape and the gazing subject. Environment Planning D: Society and Space, 24, 519-535.

- Zardini, M. (Ed.). (2005). Sense of the city: an alternate approach to urbanism. Zürichs Müller Publishers.

- Zingale, S. (2009). Il ciclo inferenziale, Deduzione, induzione, abduzione: dall'interpretazi alla progettualita. [working paper],

WEBOGRAPHY

- www.cilia-erens.nl

- www.richardmosse.com

- www.singingbridges.net

- www.soundsofeurope.eu

- www.stedelijk.nl

ESSAY 3’S BIBLIOGRAPHY

- Benach, N. (2010). La reinvención de la ciudad en un contexto global mundializado. In Ciudad y Comunicación (pp. 109-122). Madrid: Fragua Editorial.

- Benach, N., & Tello, R. (2014). Des espaces-réserve versus des espaces de résistance? In Marges urbaines et néolibéralisme en Méditerranée. Tours: Presses Universitaires François-Rabelais.

- Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. New York: Routledge.

- Clément, G. (2004). Manifeste pour le Tiers paysage. Paris: Editions Sujet/Objet.

- Doron, G. (2008). '...those marvellous empty zones at the edge of cities': Heterotopia and the "dead zone." In Heterotopia and the city (pp 203-213). London: Routledge.

- Doron, G. M. (2000). The Dead Zone and the Architecture of Transgression. City, 4(2), 247-263.

- Foucault, M. (1984). Des Espace Autres. Architecture, Mouvement, Continuité, 5, 46-49.

- Gretel Thomasz, A. (2008). Transformaciones urbanas en el sector sur del barrio porteño de Parque de los Patricios: de espacio vacío a recurso. AIBR. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 3(3), 332-365.

- Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of Hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

- Harvey, D. (2010). Spaces of Capital. New York: Routledge.

- Kociatkewicz, J., & Kostera, M. (1999). The Anthropology of Empty Spaces. Qualitative Sociology, 22(37-50).

- Pope, A. (1997). Ladders. Princeton Architectural Press.

- Smith, N. (1979). Toward a Theory of Gentrification A Back to the City Movement by Capital, not People. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45(4), 538-548.

- Sohn, H. (2008). Heterotopia: anamnesis of a medical term. In Heterotopia and the city (pp. 41-50). London: Routledge.

- Solà-Morales, I. de. (1995). Terrain Vague. In Anyplace (pp. 123-133). New York/ Cambridge: Anyone Corporation/The MIT Press.

- van Dijk, H., &Geuze, A. (1996). Colonizing the Void, The landscape as an ally. Rotterdam: NAI Publishers.

- Véron, J. (2006). L'urbanisation du monde. Paris: La Découverte.

-

WEBOGRAPHY

- www.bruno-latour.fr

ESSAY 4’S BIBLIOGRAPHY

- Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities: reimagining the urban. Cambridge: Polity Press.

- Atkinson, R., & Helms, G. (Eds.). (2007). Securing an urban renaissance: crime, community, and British urban policy. Bristol: Policy Press.

- Boddy, M. (2007). Designer neighbourhoods: new-build residential development in nonmetropolitan UK cities — the case of Bristol. Environment and Planning A, 39(1 ), 86-105.

- Bourdin, A. (2008). Gentrification : un "concept" à déconstruire. Espaces et sociétés, 1, 23-37.

- Brenner, N. (1998). Global cities, glocal states: global city formation and state territorial restructuring in contemporary Europe. Review of International Political Economy, 5, 1-37.

- Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the Geographies of "Actually Existing Neoliberalism." Antipode, 34(3), 349-379.

- Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2005). Neoliberalism and the urban condition. City, 9(1), 101-107.

- Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., & Mayer, M. (2011). Cities for People, Not for Profit. London: Routledge.

- Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010a). After Neoliberalization. Globalizations, A3), 327-345.

- Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010b). Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, pathways, modalities. Global Networks, 70(2), 182-222.

- Bridge, G. (2003). Time-space trajectories in provincial gentrification. Urban Studies, 40(12), 2545-2556.

- Bridge, G. (2014). Afterword: The Times and Spaces of Gentrification. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 105(2), 231-236.

- Butler, T., & Lees, L. (2006). Super-gentrification in Barnsbury, London: globalization and gentrifying global elites at the neighbourhood level. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31(4), 467-487.

- Clark, E. (2005). The order and simplicity of gentrification: A political challenge. In The New Urban Colonialism: Gentrification in a Global Context (pp. 256-264). London: Routledge.

- Coleman, R. (2009). 'They just look wrong': visualising 'crime' and grime in the post social city. Criminal Justice Matters, 78(1 ), 29-31.

- Davidson, M. (2008). Spoiled Mixture: Where Does State-led "Positive" Gentrification End Urban Studies, 45(12), 2385-2405.

- Davidson, M., & Iveson, K. (2014). Recovering the politics of the city: From the 'post-political city' to a "method of equality" for critical urban geography. Progress in Human Geography, 1-17, retrieved 2014 from phd.sagepub.com.

- Davidson, M., & Lees, L. (2005). New-build "gentrification" and London's riverside renaissance. Environment and Planning A, 37(7), 1165-1190.

- Doucet, B. (2014). A Process of Change and a Changing Process: Introduction to the Special Issue on Contemporary Gentrification. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 105(2), 125-139.

- Dutton, P. (2003). Leeds calling: the influence of London on the gentrification of regional cities. Urban Studies, 40(12), 2557-2572.

- Dutton, P. (2005). Outside the metropole: Gentrification in provincial cities or provincial gentrification? In The New Urban Colonialism: Gentrification in a Global Context (pp. 209-224). London: Routledge.

- Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.

- Giraud, C. (2010). Sociologie de la gaytrification (identités homosexuelles et processus de gentrification à Paris et Montréal). (J.-Y. Authier, Ed.). Université Lumière, Lyon.

- Glass, R. (1964). London: Aspects of Change. London: MacGibbon and Kee.

- Gotham, K. F. (2005). Tourism Gentrification: The Case of New Orleans' Vieux Carre (French Quarter). Urban Studies, 42(7), 1099-1121.

- Griffith, D. (2000). Social capital and economic apartheid along the coasts of the Americas. Urban Anthropology, 29(3), 255-284.

- Hackworth, J., & Smith, N. (2001). The changing state of gentrification. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 92(4), 464-477.

- Hall, S., Massey, D., & Rustin, M. (2013). After neoliberalism: analysing the present. Soundings: A journal of politics and culture, 53(1 ), 8-22.

- Hamnett, C. (1991). The blind men and the elephant: the explanation of gentrification. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 76(2), 73-89.

- Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler, 77(1), 3-317.

- Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of Hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

- Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Harvey, D. (2008). The Right to the City. New Left Review, 53, 1-18.

- Harvey, D. (2009). Social Justice and the City. Athens & London: The University of Georgia Press.

- Huisman, C. (2014). Displacement Through Participation. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 105(2), 161-174.

- Isin, I. F. (1998). Governing Toronto Without Government: Liberalism and Neoliberalism. Studies in Political Economy, 56, 169-191.

- Iveson, K. (2013). Cities within the City: Do-It-Yourself Urbanism and the Right to the City. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 941-956.

- Jessop, B. (2002). Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Urban Governance: A State-Theoretical

I Perspective. Antipode, 34(3), 452-472.

- Keil, R. (2002). "Common-Sense" Neoliberalism: Progressive Conservative Urbanism in Toronto, Canada. Antipode, 34(3), 578-601.

- Keil, R. (2010). Crisis, What Crisis? - Towards a Global Bust Regime. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(4), 941-942.

- Krugman, P. (2011, November 24). We Are the 99.9%. The New York Times. Retrieved 2014, from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11 /25/opinion/we-are-the-99-9.html?_r=0 Larner, W. (2000). Neo-liberalism: Policy, Ideology, Governmentality. Studies in Political Economy, 63, 5-25.

- Lees, L. (2008). Gentrification and Social Mixing: Towards an Inclusive Urban Renaissance? Urban Studies, 45(12), 2449-2470.

- Lees, L., & Ley, D. (2008). Introduction to Special Issue on Gentrification and Public Policy. Urban Studies, 45(12), 2379-2384.

- Lees, L., Slater, T., & Wyly, E. (2008). Gentrification. London: Routledge.

- Lefebvre, H. (1968). Le droit á la ville. Paris: Anthopos.

- Macleod, G. (2002). From Urban Entrepreneurialism to a "Revanchist City?" On the Spatial Injustices of Glasgow's Renaissance. Antipode, 34(3), 602-624.

- Macleod, G., & Johnstone, C. (2012). Stretching Urban Renaissance: Privatizing Space, Civilizing Place, Summoning "Community." International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 3<5(1), 1-28.

- Marcuse, P. (2010). In defense of theory in practice. City, 74(1-2), 4-12.

- Marston, S. A. (2000). The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 24(2), 219-242.

- Minton, A. (2012). Ground Control: Fear and happiness in the twenty-first-century city. London: Penguin.

- Mouffe, C. (2000). The Democratic Paradox. London - New York: Verso.

- Ong, A. (2007). Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 1-6.

- Oosterlynck, S., & González, S. (2013). "Don't Waste a Crisis": Opening up the City Yet Again for Neoliberal Experimentation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 1075-1082.

- Parsons, D. (1980). Rural gentrification : the influence of rural settlement planning policies. Brighton: University of Sussex.

- Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3), 380-404.

- Peck, J., Theodore, N., & Brenner, N. (2013). Neoliberal Urbanism Redux? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 1091-1099.

- Perlik, M. (2011). Alpine gentrification: The mountain village as a metropolitan neighbourhood. Revue de Geographie Alpine / Journal of Alpine Research, 99(1), 1-13.

- Poole, S. (2007). Unspeak: Words Are Weapons. London: Little, Brown.

- Powell, J., & Spencer, M. (2003). Giving them the old "one-two": Gentrification and the K 0 of impoverished urban dwellers of color. Howard Law Journal, 4ó(3), 433-490. Purcell, M. (2006). Urban Democracy and the Local Trap. Urban Studies, 43(11), 1921-1941.

- Purcell, M. (2008). Recapturing Democracy: Neoliberalization and the Struggle for Alternative Urban Futures. London: Routledge.

- Rérat, P., Soderstrom, O., & Piguet, E. (2009). New forms of gentrification: issues and debates. Population, Space and Place, retrieved 2014 from www.interscience.wiley.com.

- Rose, D. (1984). Rethinking gentrification: Beyond the uneven development of Marxist urban theory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, I, 47-74.

- Sassen, S. (1991). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

- Sassen, S. (1994). Cities in a World Economy. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

- Sen, A. K. (1992). Inequality Reexamined. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

- Slater, T. (2006). The Eviction of Critical Perspectives from Gentrification Research. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(4), 737-757.

- Smith, D. (2002). Patterns and processes of "studentification" in Leeds. Regional Review, 7 7, 17-19.

- Smith, N. (1996). The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London: Psychology Press.

- Smith, N. (2002). New Globalism, New Urbanism: Gentrification as Global Urban Strategy. Antipode, 34(3), 427-450.

- Véron, J. (2006). L'urbanisation du monde. Paris: La Découverte.

- Weber, R. (2002). Extracting Value from the City: Neoliberalism and Urban Redevelopment. Antipode, 34(3).

- Zukin, S. (1982). Loft living: culture and capital in urban change. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

- Zukin, S., & Kosta, E. (2004). Bourdieu Off- Broadway: managing distinction on a shopping block in the East Village. City and Community, 3(2), 101-114.

WEBOGRAPHY

- www.unspeak.submarinechannel.com

- www.lwbooks.co.uk