Daniele De Riccardis, Haifa Baccouche
Cost optimal in the refubishment of public buildings toward nearly zero energy target : a case study : Piedmont local education authority office, Turin.
Rel. Vincenzo Corrado, Simona Paduos. Politecnico di Torino, Corso di laurea magistrale in Architettura Costruzione Città, 2016
Abstract: |
GENERAL OVERVIEW Reducing the building energy consumption to nearly zero energy level is one of the priority directions towards finding modern solutions to improve the energy performance of the building sector. In accordance with Directive 2010/31/EC and the Energy Efficiency Plan 2011, Member States of the European Union shall draw up national action plans for taking the energy consumption and related Greenhouse-Gas of new buildings close to zero and for stimulating the refurbishment of the existing building stock into nearly zero-energy buildings. The provisions of the Energy Performance of Building Directive (EPBD) introduced in Article 9 the concept of nearly Zero-Energy Buildings (nZEB) stating that "by 31 December 2020, all new buildings are nearly zero - energy buildings; and after 31 December 2018, new buildings occupied and owned by public authorities are nearly zero-energy buildings". Although the EPBD Recast focuses on ex-novo, the energy and C02 emissions associated with the refurbishment of existing buildings towards nZEB are worth being investigated because of their huge energy saving potentialities. Notably existing public buildings refurbishments play a crucial role in reaching the european goals for energy saving: they lead as example for private investors and should therefore endeavor to implement the nZEB fully. This thesis work stemmed from the IEE RePublic_ZEB project, in which the Department of Energy (DENERG) at the Polytechnic of Turin was involved, representing the italian contribution. Among the many european projects that took place in the last few years, this is aimed at supporting the refurbishment of public buildings in southern Europe towards the nearly zero energy target. The nZEB concept ragarding renovations, in fact, still does not seem to be easily applied by member countries: the past and current IEE programs efforts clearly show that required investments and optimal integration of the technologies suitable for the renovation of buildings are among the major barriers to the implementation. Furthermore, the lack of confidence of building industry and building owners in the real energy performance of nZEBs and the concrete risks associated to new technologies seem to represent one of the keypoints the resolution of which could possibly solve the problem related to the high investments required in the process. In this context, the RePublic_ZEB proposal is focused on economically sustainable strategies and policies aimed at enforcing the refurbishment of the public building stock towards nZEB levels, according to EU 20/20/20 target. Thus the main objectives are to encourage the South-Eastern European countries to promote on the market a set of concrete technical solutions for the refurbishment of their public building stock towards the nearly zero energy target by increasing the involved key actors' confidence in nZEB, taking this way tangible steps to accelerate the renovation process and boost a real market demand to such buildings. In order to achieve the above mentioned goals, the addressed key actors are meant to be builders and public building owners, policy developers (authorities), building technology industries and national professionals associations referred to the building industry (as architects and engineers). The thesis mainly concerned Work Package n° 3 (Assessment of the status quo and analysis of opportunities for refurbishing public buildings towards nZEB) and Work Package n° 4 (Costs/ benefits analysis of the "packages of measures" for the refurbishment towards nZEB): these were also the steps taken in our work, applying cost optimality on the office case study. Within the first step, the energy efficiency measures to be applied through deep refurbishment interventions on offices were detailed. The interventions concern the building envelope, HVAC, DHW and lighting systems, including technologies based on the usage of RES. This stage was aimed to define a set of the most suitable building technologies (Energy Efficiency Measures) available on the italian market to reach the nZEB target for the public building stock. Local installers, manufacturers and technicians were involved in the market survey. We committed to being as precise as possible regarding the costs of the several interventions, going beyond the Piedmont Price List, our purpose was not to underestimate the evaluations, trying to provide costs and technical data as close as possible to reality, assuming the real implementation of such a project. In the following phase, corresponding to the WP4, the most suitable building technologies and technical systems were combined into packages of measures for the cost optimal energy and economic analysis. The aim of this step was to provide quantitative results in terms of saving energy and corresponding cost benefits that, in case of a real refurbishment, could increase builders' confidence in nZEB projects. For the application of this methodology, an Excel format calculation tool was developed by the DENERG, it consists in a series of interconnected sheets able to provide, for each case study considered, the best cost-benefit technology solution aimed at reducing energy consumption, both for new buildings and existing buildings undergoing total renovation. The energy assessment was conducted using a quasi-stationary methodology, in accordance with technical specifications UNI/TS 11300-1/4, in order to predict global energy consumption for individual buildings; the economic assessment was conducted in accordance with standard UNI EN 15459 with the aim to predict the overall cost in a context of new construction or total renovation. In conclusion, it can be said that, as the nZEB is not yet considered cost-efficient, cost optimal and nZEB requirements still have to be reconciled so that a smooth transaction from cost optimal requirements to nearly zero energy buildings could be guaranteed. This will require significant policy interventions, including increased support for research, development, deployment and demonstration of advanced building technologies. Such european projects are essential for policy makers as they can provide them tools to critically analyze the incentive system of our country, to identify any inconsistencies introduced in the recent past and to search for the opportunities offered by new technologies, in order to optimize the efforts. This is even more important for Italian public existing buildings, for which nZEB renovations requirements have just been introduced and common practices still need to be assessed. |
---|---|
Relatori: | Vincenzo Corrado, Simona Paduos |
Tipo di pubblicazione: | A stampa |
Soggetti: | A Architettura > AM Estimo S Scienze e Scienze Applicate > SH Fisica tecnica |
Corso di laurea: | Corso di laurea magistrale in Architettura Costruzione Città |
Classe di laurea: | NON SPECIFICATO |
Aziende collaboratrici: | NON SPECIFICATO |
URI: | http://webthesis.biblio.polito.it/id/eprint/4589 |
Capitoli: | SUMMARY GENERAL OVERVIEW PART 1 1_THE ENERGY REGULATION FRAMEWORK 1.1 THE EUROPEAN ENERGY REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 1.1.1 The EU Directive on the energy performance of buildings: EPBD 2002/91 1.1.2 The European 20 -20 -20 Targets 1.1.3 The EPBD recast 1.2 THE ITALIAN ENERGY REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 1.2.1 The national Law 10/1991 1.2.2 EPBD national implementation 1.2.3 EPBD recast national implementation towards the 2020 targets 2_THE COST OPTIMAL METHODOLOGY 2.1 THE COST OPTIMAL APPROACH 2.1.1 Definition of the reference buildings 2.1.2 Identification of the energy efficiency measures 2.1.3 Calculation of the primary energy performance 2.1.4 Calculation of the Global Cost 2.1.5 Cost Optimal level of energy performance requirements 2.1.6 Undertaking of sensitivity analysis 3_NEARLY ZERO ENERGY BUILDINGS 3.1 NEARLY ZERO ENERGY BUILDINGS (nZEB) 3.2 COST OPTIMAL TOWARDS nZEB 3.3 EUROPEAN COUNTRIES nZEB SCENARIO 3.3.1 Cross - country comparison 3.4 EU RESEARCH ON nZEBs 3.4.1 Before RePublic_ZEB 3.4.2 RePublic ZEB PART 2 1_THE CASE STUDY: STATE OF ART 1.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE BUILDING 1.1.1 The climate data 1.2 THE ENVELOPE 1.2.1 Opaque envelope 1.2.2 Transparent envelope 1.3 THE TECHNICAL SYSTEMS 1.3.1 Heating system 1.3.2 Dhw system 1.3.3 Ventilation system 1.3.4 Lighting system 1.4 THE THERMAL ZONES 1.3 THE TECHNICAL DATA SHEET 2_TECHIMOLOGIES FOR REFURBISHMENT 2.1 THE ENVELOPE 2.1.1 Regulatory framework and characterizing parameters 2.1.2 Italy and prospects for the envelope retrofit 2.1.3 Opaque envelope retrofit 2.1.4 Transparent envelope retrofit 2.1.5 List of technologies, parameters and costs 2.2 THE HEATING, COOLING AND DHW TECHNICAL SYSTEMS 2.2.1 Italy and prospects for energy effciency 2.2.2 Technologies for energy efficiency - an overview 2.2.3 Emission retrofit 2.2.4 Control retrofit 2.2.5 Heating/cooling generation retrofit 2.2.6 Distribution and storage sub-system retrofit 2.3 THE THERMAL SOLAR SYSTEM 2.3.1 Flat solar, Vacuum solar collectors retrofit 2.3.2 List of technologies, parameters and costs 2.4 THE PHOTOVOLTAIC (PV) SYSTEM 2.4.1 List of technologies, parameters and costs 2.5 THE VENTILATION AND AIR HANDLING 2.5.1 Regulatory framework and parameters characterizing 2.5.2 Air handling unit retrofit 2.5.3 List of technologies, parameters and costs 2.6 THE LIGHTING TECHNICAL SYSTEM 2.6.1 Regulatory framework and characterizing parameters 2.6.2 Artificial lighting sources retrofit 2.6.3 Lighting control retrofit 2.6.4 List of technologies, parameters and costs 3_THE CASE STUDY: RETROFIT 3.1 DEFINITION OF THE REFURBISHMENT ENERGY MEASURES AND PACKAGES 3.1.1 The envelope refurbishment 3.1.2 The heating, cooling and DHW technical systems refurbishment 3.1.3 Ventilation and air handling refurbishment 3.1.4 PV system 3.1.5 The lighting system refurbishment 3.2 QUASI STEADY CALCULATION PROCEDURE 3.2.1 Calculation of the actual energy performance and referred actualized costs 3.2.2 Calculation of the cost-optimal solution 3.2.3 Search for the nZEB solution 3.3 DYNAMIC CALCULATION PROCEDURE 3.4 RESULTS 3.4.1 Quasi-steady calculation and TOOL results 3.4.2 Dynamic calculation results 4_CONCLUSIONS ANNEX ANNEX I - Republic_ZEB PARTNERS ANNEX II. INSULATING MATERIALS ANNEX III. WINDOWS TYPOLOGIES ANNEX IV. HVAC AND DHW SYSTEM COSTS DATA ANNEX V. PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM ANNEX VI. HEAT RECOVERY VENTILATION AN AIR HANDLING UNIT ANNEX VII. CALCULATION OF LIGHTING POWER DENSITY USING DIFFERENT LIGHTING SOURCES AND RELATIVE COSTS ANNEX VIII. LAYERS OF ENVELOPE BUILDING COMPONENTS FOR REFURBISHMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY |
Bibliografia: | REGULATIONS EPBD recast, Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (recast), Official Journal of the European Union, 2010. EU, Directive 2012/27/EU ,European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 20?2-on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/Ec and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC. EC, Guidelines accompanying Commission Delegated Regulation(EU),no.244/ 2012 of 16 Janua¬ry 2012 supplementing Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the energy performance of buildings by establishing a comparative methodology framework for calculating cost- optimal levels of minimum energy performance requirements for buildings and building elements ,Official Journal of the European Commission. Ministerial Decree 26-6-2015; Applicazione della metodologia di calcolo delle prestazioni ener-getiche e definizione delle prescrizioni e dei requisiti minimi degli edifici. Conto termico 20-01-2016. STANDARDS UNI/TS 11300- 1:2014; Determinazione del fabbisogno di energia termica dell'edificio per la climatizzazione estiva ed invernale. UNI/TS 11300-2:2014; Determinazione del fabbisogno di energia primaria e dei rendimenti per la climatizzazione invernale e per la produzione di acqua calda sanitaria. UNI/TS 11300-3:2014; Determinazione del fabbisogno di energia primaria e dei rendimenti per la climatizzazione estiva. UNI/TS 11300-4:2014; Utilizzo di energie rinnovabili e di altri metodi di generazione per la climatizzazione invernale e per la produzione di acqua calda sanitaria. EN 15459:2008; Energy efficiency for buildings- Standard economic evaluation procedure for energy systems in buildings. EN 15316-4-1: 2008 Heating systems in building. Method for calculation of system energy requirements and system efficiencies. Space heating generation systems, combustion systems (boilers) EN 12464 -1:2011 Luce e Illuminazione -Illuminazione dei posti di lavoro. EN 15193 :2007 Energy performance of buildings-Energy requirements for lighting. EN 10339 :2011 Impianto aeraulico a fini di benessere. UNI EN 15232: 2012 Prestazione energetica degli edifici-incidenza dell'automazione, della regolazione, e della gestione tecnica degli edifici pr UNI 10349-1 "Riscaldamento e raffrescamelo degli edifici. Dati climatici. Medie mensili e dati orari per la valutazione della prestazione termo-energetica dell'edificio." PAPER RePublic _ZEB, Refurbishment of the public building stock towards nZEB, Report on the state -of-the EPBD national implementation, describing policy mapping comprising ,the assessment of the existing national plans, policies and regulatory frameworks of target countries existing barriers and best practices, 2015. ASIEPI, Panek, A; Impact, compliance and control of legislation, Summary report, 2010. ASIEPI, The final recommendations of the ASIEPI project : how to make EPB-regulations more effective?, Summary report, 2010. ASIEPI, Marleen, S; Comparison of energy performance requirement levels :possibillties and impossibilities, Summary report, 2010. DATAMINE, Collecting data from energy certification to minitor performance indicators for new and existing buildings,Final report, 2009 . ECOFYS, Politecnico di Milano/eERG, University of Wuppertal; towards Nearly Zero Energy Buildings, definition of common principle sunder the EPBD, Final report, 2013. ECOFYS, Groezinger, J; Boermans, T; John, A; Seehusen, J; Wehringer, F; Scherberich, M; Over-view of member states information on nZEBs ,Working version of the progress report; Final report, 2014^ ENTRANZE; cross-analysis on Member States plans to develop their building regulations towards the nZeb standard,2013. ENTRANZE; Laying down the pathways to nearly Zero- Energy Buildings, 2014. ENTRANZE, Pietrobon, M; Armani, R; Zangheri, P; Pagliono, L; Report on cost /Energy curves calculation, D3.3. of WP3 of the Entranze Project ,2013. REHVA, Federation of European Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Associations; Task Force on technical definition for Nearly Zero Energy Buildings, Technical definition and system boundaries for nearly zero energy buildings,2013 revision for uniformed national implementation of EPBD recast prepared in Cooperation with European standardization organization CEN, Report no.4,2013. REHVA, Buso, T; Derjanecz, A Litiu, A; Corgnati, S.P; Kurnitski, J; nZEB definition in Europe, Report, 2014. REHVA, Wittchen, K.B; Thomsen, K.E; Implementation of the cost optimal methodology according to the EPBD recast, 2012. TABULA, Episcope, Inclusion of new buildings in residential building typologies, Steps towards NZEBs, Exemplified for different European countries, Report no.1, 2014. TABULA , Ballarmi, L; Corrado, V; Corgnati, Building typology brochure-ltaly, Fascicolo sulla tipologia edilizia Italiana, 2014. TABULA, Ballarmi, L; Corrado, V; Corgnati, S.P; National scientific report on the TABULA activities in Italy, 2012. Aggerholm, S; Erhorn, H; Hitchin, R; Erhorn-Kluttig, H; Poel, B; Engelund-Thomsen, K; Wittchen, K.B; Concerted action, Energy performance of buildings, Cost optimal levels for energy performance requirements, 2011. Arcipowska, A; Anagnostopoulos, F; Mariottini, F; Kunkel, S; Energy performance certificates across the EU, A mapping of national approaches, The buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE), 2014. Associazione Italiana riscaldamento urbano (AIRU), Legambiente; Il teleriscaldamento in Italia -Stato attuale e potenzialità di sviluppo - Scenario dei benefici energetici ed ambientali, Rapporto, 2012. Barthelmes, V.M; Becchio, C; Bottero, M.C; Corgnati, S.P; The influence of the energy targets and economic concerns in design strategies for a residential Nearly -Zero Energy Building Report no.4, Buildings 2014. Barthelmes, V.M; Becchio, C; Bottero, M.C; Corgnati, S.P; The influence of the energy targets and economic concerns in design strategies for a residential Nearly -Zero Energy Building ,Report no.4, Buildings 2014. Beccali, M; Galatioto, A; Leone, G; Longo, S; Is the nZEB benchmarking approach suitable for assessing energy retrofit design, Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols .361-363, 2013. Corrado, V; Building typology brochure-ltaly, Fascicolo sulla tipologia edilizia italiana politecnico di Torino, 2011. Corrado, V; Ballarmi, I; Paduos, S; Assessment of cost -optimal Energy performance requirement for the Italian residential building stock, 2013. Corrado, V; Ballarmi, I; Paduos, S; The application of the EU comparative methodology to Italian reference buildings for the Cost -Optimal analysis, 2013. Corrado, V; Criteri generali e requisiti delle prestazioni energetiche degli edifici, Allegato 1, 2015. D'agostino, D; Assessment of the progress towards the establishment of definitions of nearly Zero Energy Buildings (nZEBs) in European Member States, Journal of Building Engineering, 2015. Di Pietra, B; Margiotta, F ; Intervento di riqualificazione energetica complesso residenziale popolare ATC Biella, Enea, 2009. Giovanni, M; Giovanni, R; Individuazione delle innovazioni ai fini del contenimento dei consumi elettrici e in generale dei consumi energetici degli e dei costi dei Nzeb da parte della pubblica amministrazione, Enea, 2014. Moring, J.M; Veronesi, M; Zaccaria, R; Rossi, S; Power house nearly Zero Energy building in divided/cooperative ownership, How to finance energy, 2013. Nolte, N; Rapf, 0; Staniaszek, D; Faber, M; Implimenting the cost-optimal methodology in EUcountries, 2013. Politecnico di Milano; Enel Foundation, Stato e prospettive dell'efficienza energetica in Italia, Rapporto no.1, 2013. Rossi, M; Eco light design, linee guida impianto illuminazione nuovo capannone Aleniaaermacchi, Report RSE no.43, 2009. Science Application International Corporation Canada, Compact thermal energy storage technology assessment,Report, 2013. TEP srl, AN IT, Isolamento termico degli edifici, Materiali utilizzati e soluzioni tipologiche più ricorrenti con dettaglio costi, 2012. The buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE), Nearly Zero Energy Buildings, Definitions across europe, Report, 2015. The building Performance Instituite Europe (BPIE), Discussing methodology and challenges within the recast Energy Performance of Building Directive, 2010. BPIE, Europe's buildings under the microscope. A country-by-country review of the energy performance of buildings, 2011 Dall'O' G., Bruni E., Panza A.; Improvement of the sustainability of existing school buildings according to the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)® Protocol: a case study in Italy, MDPI Energies, 2013. Dall'O' G., Sarto L., Potential and limits to improve energy efficiency in space heating in existing school buildings in northern Italy. Energy and Buildings 67, 2013. De Santoli L., Fraticelli F., Fornari F., Calice C., Energy performance assessment and a retrofit strategies in public school buildings in Rome. Energy and Buildings 68, 2014. BOOKS Gaspari, J ; Trabucco, D; Zannoni, G; Involucro edilizio e aspetti di sostenibilità, Franco Angeli, 2010. Pardi, G; Lucci, A; Architettura energetica. Soluzioni sperimentali per il risparmio energetico nell'housing, Alinea editrice, 2010. Rea, M.S; The IESNA lighting handbook. Reference and application, Ninth edition, FIES editor in Chief, New York, 2000. Simpson, R.S; Lighting control .Technology and applications, Focal Press, Oxford, 2003. |
Modifica (riservato agli operatori) |